Japan vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Japan
5.90 trillion constant LCU
in 2024
Rwanda
4.45 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Japan rank
21st
Rwanda rank
23rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Japan
  • Rwanda
02.0T4.0T6.0T8.0T10.0T196519952025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 5.90 trillion constant LCU against 4.45 trillion constant LCU in Rwanda, a difference of 1.45 trillion constant LCU.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 23rd of 197 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 8.66 trillion constant LCU 974.00 billion constant LCU 7.68 trillion constant LCU Japan
2000s 8.20 trillion constant LCU 1.85 trillion constant LCU 6.35 trillion constant LCU Japan
2010s 6.94 trillion constant LCU 2.92 trillion constant LCU 4.02 trillion constant LCU Japan
2020s 5.86 trillion constant LCU 3.89 trillion constant LCU 1.96 trillion constant LCU Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Japan or Rwanda?
Japan, at 5.90 trillion constant LCU against 4.45 trillion constant LCU in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Japan and Rwanda?
1.45 trillion constant LCU, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Rwanda?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Japan and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Japan ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 23rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/japan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/japan/rwanda/">Japan vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.