Iraq vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Iraq
7.04 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Pakistan
9.70 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Iraq rank
20th
Pakistan rank
17th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Iraq
  • Pakistan
2.0T4.0T6.0T8.0T10.0T196019922025

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 9.70 trillion constant LCU against 7.04 trillion constant LCU in Iraq, a difference of 2.65 trillion constant LCU.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.4 times Iraq's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 20th and Pakistan ranks 17th of 197 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 2.08 trillion constant LCU 1.56 trillion constant LCU 523.90 billion constant LCU Iraq
1970s 2.52 trillion constant LCU 1.85 trillion constant LCU 666.35 billion constant LCU Iraq
1980s 3.21 trillion constant LCU 2.61 trillion constant LCU 596.70 billion constant LCU Iraq
1990s 4.85 trillion constant LCU 3.99 trillion constant LCU 866.30 billion constant LCU Iraq
2000s 5.83 trillion constant LCU 5.61 trillion constant LCU 216.87 billion constant LCU Iraq
2010s 5.85 trillion constant LCU 7.15 trillion constant LCU 1.30 trillion constant LCU Pakistan
2020s 7.62 trillion constant LCU 8.93 trillion constant LCU 1.31 trillion constant LCU Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Iraq or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 9.70 trillion constant LCU against 7.04 trillion constant LCU in Iraq as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Iraq and Pakistan?
2.65 trillion constant LCU, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Pakistan?
58 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2025.
How do Iraq and Pakistan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Iraq ranks 20th and Pakistan ranks 17th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/iraq/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/iraq/pakistan/">Iraq vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.