Iceland vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Iceland
130.59 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Uruguay
130.11 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Iceland rank
67th
Uruguay rank
68th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Iceland
  • Uruguay
050.0B100.0B150.0B198320042025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 130.59 billion constant LCU against 130.11 billion constant LCU in Uruguay, a difference of 486.00 million constant LCU.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 67th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 197 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 129.15 billion constant LCU 90.09 billion constant LCU 39.06 billion constant LCU Iceland
2000s 123.91 billion constant LCU 94.55 billion constant LCU 29.36 billion constant LCU Iceland
2010s 123.48 billion constant LCU 110.97 billion constant LCU 12.52 billion constant LCU Iceland
2020s 143.18 billion constant LCU 115.95 billion constant LCU 27.23 billion constant LCU Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Iceland or Uruguay?
Iceland, at 130.59 billion constant LCU against 130.11 billion constant LCU in Uruguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Iceland and Uruguay?
486.00 million constant LCU, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Uruguay?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Uruguay rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Iceland ranks 67th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/iceland/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/iceland/uruguay/">Iceland vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.