Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Hong Kong, China
1.08 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Latvia
1.00 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
153rd
Latvia rank
154th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Latvia
500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B199520102025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.08 billion constant LCU against 1.00 billion constant LCU in Latvia, a difference of 82.51 million constant LCU.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 153rd and Latvia ranks 154th of 197 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 2.03 billion constant LCU 828.72 million constant LCU 1.20 billion constant LCU Hong Kong, China
2010s 1.48 billion constant LCU 1.00 billion constant LCU 477.53 million constant LCU Hong Kong, China
2020s 1.19 billion constant LCU 1.08 billion constant LCU 116.63 million constant LCU Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.08 billion constant LCU against 1.00 billion constant LCU in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
82.51 million constant LCU, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Hong Kong, China ranks 153rd and Latvia ranks 154th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/">Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.