Guatemala vs Mauritania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Guatemala
54.57 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Mauritania
59.31 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Guatemala rank
83rd
Mauritania rank
82nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mauritania
020.0B40.0B60.0B196019922025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 59.31 billion constant LCU against 54.57 billion constant LCU in Guatemala, a difference of 4.74 billion constant LCU.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Guatemala ranks 83rd and Mauritania ranks 82nd of 197 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 9.77 billion constant LCU 28.60 billion constant LCU 18.83 billion constant LCU Mauritania
1970s 15.87 billion constant LCU 24.28 billion constant LCU 8.41 billion constant LCU Mauritania
1980s 19.26 billion constant LCU 29.55 billion constant LCU 10.29 billion constant LCU Mauritania
1990s 24.75 billion constant LCU 35.34 billion constant LCU 10.58 billion constant LCU Mauritania
2000s 32.88 billion constant LCU 32.11 billion constant LCU 763.65 million constant LCU Guatemala
2010s 44.16 billion constant LCU 42.68 billion constant LCU 1.48 billion constant LCU Guatemala
2020s 52.69 billion constant LCU 54.44 billion constant LCU 1.75 billion constant LCU Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Guatemala or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 59.31 billion constant LCU against 54.57 billion constant LCU in Guatemala as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Guatemala and Mauritania?
4.74 billion constant LCU, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mauritania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Guatemala and Mauritania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Guatemala ranks 83rd and Mauritania ranks 82nd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mauritania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/guatemala/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/guatemala/mauritania/">Guatemala vs Mauritania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.