Estonia vs Palestine, State of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Estonia
399.08 million constant LCU
in 2025
Palestine, State of
622.80 million constant LCU
in 2025
Estonia rank
165th
Palestine, State of rank
163rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Estonia
  • Palestine, State of
200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B1.2B199420092025

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 622.80 million constant LCU against 399.08 million constant LCU in Estonia, a difference of 223.72 million constant LCU.

That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.6 times Estonia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 165th and Palestine, State of ranks 163rd of 197 countries.

Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 344.36 million constant LCU 693.16 million constant LCU 348.80 million constant LCU Palestine, State of
2000s 485.26 million constant LCU 737.10 million constant LCU 251.84 million constant LCU Palestine, State of
2010s 595.88 million constant LCU 1.07 billion constant LCU 471.78 million constant LCU Palestine, State of
2020s 438.12 million constant LCU 802.93 million constant LCU 364.82 million constant LCU Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Estonia or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 622.80 million constant LCU against 399.08 million constant LCU in Estonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Estonia and Palestine, State of?
223.72 million constant LCU, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Palestine, State of?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Estonia and Palestine, State of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Estonia ranks 165th and Palestine, State of ranks 163rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Palestine, State of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/estonia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/estonia/west-bank-and-gaza/">Estonia vs Palestine, State of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.