Eritrea vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Eritrea
955.34 million constant LCU
in 2009
Latvia
1.00 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Eritrea rank
155th
Latvia rank
154th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Eritrea
  • Latvia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199220082025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 1.00 billion constant LCU against 955.34 million constant LCU in Eritrea, a difference of 47.16 million constant LCU.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 155th and Latvia ranks 154th of 197 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.27 billion constant LCU 638.64 million constant LCU 628.62 million constant LCU Eritrea
2000s 1.14 billion constant LCU 828.72 million constant LCU 307.07 million constant LCU Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Eritrea or Latvia?
Latvia, at 1.00 billion constant LCU against 955.34 million constant LCU in Eritrea as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Eritrea and Latvia?
47.16 million constant LCU, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Latvia?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2009.
How do Eritrea and Latvia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Eritrea ranks 155th and Latvia ranks 154th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/eritrea/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/eritrea/latvia/">Eritrea vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.