Eritrea vs Hong Kong, China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Eritrea
955.34 million constant LCU
in 2009
Hong Kong, China
1.08 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Eritrea rank
155th
Hong Kong, China rank
153rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Eritrea
  • Hong Kong, China
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B199220082025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.08 billion constant LCU against 955.34 million constant LCU in Eritrea, a difference of 129.66 million constant LCU.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 155th and Hong Kong, China ranks 153rd of 197 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Eritrea or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.08 billion constant LCU against 955.34 million constant LCU in Eritrea as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Eritrea and Hong Kong, China?
129.66 million constant LCU, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Hong Kong, China?
10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
How do Eritrea and Hong Kong, China rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Eritrea ranks 155th and Hong Kong, China ranks 153rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Hong Kong, China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/eritrea/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/eritrea/hong-kong-sar-china/">Eritrea vs Hong Kong, China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.