El Salvador vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

El Salvador
1.35 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Lesotho
1.46 billion constant LCU
in 2025
El Salvador rank
151st
Lesotho rank
149th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • El Salvador
  • Lesotho
1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B196519952025

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 1.46 billion constant LCU against 1.35 billion constant LCU in El Salvador, a difference of 113.33 million constant LCU.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 151st and Lesotho ranks 149th of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and Lesotho in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Lesotho Difference Ahead
1970s 1.97 billion constant LCU 1.06 billion constant LCU 906.34 million constant LCU El Salvador
1980s 1.85 billion constant LCU 1.02 billion constant LCU 835.83 million constant LCU El Salvador
1990s 1.74 billion constant LCU 968.36 million constant LCU 767.42 million constant LCU El Salvador
2000s 1.36 billion constant LCU 964.03 million constant LCU 395.48 million constant LCU El Salvador
2010s 1.35 billion constant LCU 1.04 billion constant LCU 303.71 million constant LCU El Salvador
2020s 1.32 billion constant LCU 1.34 billion constant LCU 25.13 million constant LCU Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, El Salvador or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 1.46 billion constant LCU against 1.35 billion constant LCU in El Salvador as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between El Salvador and Lesotho?
113.33 million constant LCU, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Lesotho?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do El Salvador and Lesotho rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
El Salvador ranks 151st and Lesotho ranks 149th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/el-salvador/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/el-salvador/lesotho/">El Salvador vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.