Egypt vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Egypt
953.26 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Sri Lanka
929.67 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Egypt rank
44th
Sri Lanka rank
45th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Egypt
  • Sri Lanka
200.0B400.0B600.0B800.0B1.0T196019922025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 953.26 billion constant LCU against 929.67 billion constant LCU in Sri Lanka, a difference of 23.59 billion constant LCU.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Egypt ranks 44th and Sri Lanka ranks 45th of 197 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 170.10 billion constant LCU 243.59 billion constant LCU 73.49 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
1970s 202.61 billion constant LCU 303.47 billion constant LCU 100.86 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
1980s 261.69 billion constant LCU 418.28 billion constant LCU 156.59 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
1990s 350.49 billion constant LCU 505.84 billion constant LCU 155.35 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
2000s 491.66 billion constant LCU 596.23 billion constant LCU 104.57 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
2010s 671.87 billion constant LCU 876.79 billion constant LCU 204.93 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
2020s 875.69 billion constant LCU 926.89 billion constant LCU 51.20 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Egypt or Sri Lanka?
Egypt, at 953.26 billion constant LCU against 929.67 billion constant LCU in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Egypt and Sri Lanka?
23.59 billion constant LCU, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sri Lanka?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Egypt and Sri Lanka rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Egypt ranks 44th and Sri Lanka ranks 45th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/egypt-arab-rep/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/egypt-arab-rep/sri-lanka/">Egypt vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.