Ecuador vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Ecuador
10.24 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Namibia
10.27 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Ecuador rank
117th
Namibia rank
116th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Ecuador
  • Namibia
05.0B10.0B15.0B196019922025

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 10.27 billion constant LCU against 10.24 billion constant LCU in Ecuador, a difference of 29.70 million constant LCU.

Across all 46 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 116th of 195 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 2.00 billion constant LCU 7.20 billion constant LCU 5.20 billion constant LCU Namibia
1990s 3.26 billion constant LCU 8.64 billion constant LCU 5.38 billion constant LCU Namibia
2000s 4.65 billion constant LCU 11.57 billion constant LCU 6.92 billion constant LCU Namibia
2010s 7.12 billion constant LCU 10.83 billion constant LCU 3.71 billion constant LCU Namibia
2020s 9.27 billion constant LCU 10.86 billion constant LCU 1.58 billion constant LCU Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Ecuador or Namibia?
Namibia, at 10.27 billion constant LCU against 10.24 billion constant LCU in Ecuador as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Ecuador and Namibia?
29.70 million constant LCU, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Ecuador ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 116th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/ecuador/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/ecuador/namibia/">Ecuador vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
196 places, 8,477 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.