Costa Rica vs Malawi: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Costa Rica
1.91 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Malawi
1.75 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
38th
Malawi rank
40th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Malawi
500.0B1.0T1.5T2.0T196019922025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1.91 trillion constant LCU against 1.75 trillion constant LCU in Malawi, a difference of 161.72 billion constant LCU.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 38th and Malawi ranks 40th of 197 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 415.85 billion constant LCU 299.20 billion constant LCU 116.64 billion constant LCU Costa Rica
1970s 551.87 billion constant LCU 393.10 billion constant LCU 158.77 billion constant LCU Costa Rica
1980s 687.29 billion constant LCU 477.06 billion constant LCU 210.23 billion constant LCU Costa Rica
1990s 1.08 trillion constant LCU 696.54 billion constant LCU 381.36 billion constant LCU Costa Rica
2000s 1.48 trillion constant LCU 1.08 trillion constant LCU 398.01 billion constant LCU Costa Rica
2010s 1.81 trillion constant LCU 1.43 trillion constant LCU 377.50 billion constant LCU Costa Rica
2020s 1.92 trillion constant LCU 1.71 trillion constant LCU 206.08 billion constant LCU Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Costa Rica or Malawi?
Costa Rica, at 1.91 trillion constant LCU against 1.75 trillion constant LCU in Malawi as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Costa Rica and Malawi?
161.72 billion constant LCU, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malawi?
59 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Malawi rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Costa Rica ranks 38th and Malawi ranks 40th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Malawi: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/costa-rica/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/costa-rica/malawi/">Costa Rica vs Malawi: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.