Costa Rica vs Kenya: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Costa Rica
1.91 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Kenya
1.92 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
38th
Kenya rank
37th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Kenya
500.0B1.0T1.5T2.0T196019922025

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 1.92 trillion constant LCU against 1.91 trillion constant LCU in Costa Rica, a difference of 10.81 billion constant LCU.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 38th and Kenya ranks 37th of 197 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 6 and Kenya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 372.75 billion constant LCU 327.93 billion constant LCU 44.82 billion constant LCU Costa Rica
1970s 551.87 billion constant LCU 484.86 billion constant LCU 67.01 billion constant LCU Costa Rica
1980s 687.29 billion constant LCU 702.71 billion constant LCU 15.42 billion constant LCU Kenya
1990s 1.08 trillion constant LCU 865.33 billion constant LCU 212.57 billion constant LCU Costa Rica
2000s 1.48 trillion constant LCU 1.14 trillion constant LCU 339.47 billion constant LCU Costa Rica
2010s 1.81 trillion constant LCU 1.46 trillion constant LCU 347.00 billion constant LCU Costa Rica
2020s 1.92 trillion constant LCU 1.77 trillion constant LCU 144.36 billion constant LCU Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Costa Rica or Kenya?
Kenya, at 1.92 trillion constant LCU against 1.91 trillion constant LCU in Costa Rica as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Costa Rica and Kenya?
10.81 billion constant LCU, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kenya?
62 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Kenya rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Costa Rica ranks 38th and Kenya ranks 37th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Kenya: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/costa-rica/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/costa-rica/kenya/">Costa Rica vs Kenya: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.