Congo vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Congo
406.71 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Nepal
725.01 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Congo rank
54th
Nepal rank
51st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Congo
  • Nepal
0200.0B400.0B600.0B800.0B196019922025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 725.01 billion constant LCU against 406.71 billion constant LCU in Congo, a difference of 318.30 billion constant LCU.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.8 times Congo's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 54th and Nepal ranks 51st of 197 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 80.52 billion constant LCU 153.42 billion constant LCU 72.90 billion constant LCU Nepal
1970s 103.26 billion constant LCU 170.51 billion constant LCU 67.25 billion constant LCU Nepal
1980s 143.69 billion constant LCU 207.89 billion constant LCU 64.19 billion constant LCU Nepal
1990s 157.89 billion constant LCU 284.76 billion constant LCU 126.87 billion constant LCU Nepal
2000s 201.64 billion constant LCU 391.22 billion constant LCU 189.58 billion constant LCU Nepal
2010s 299.28 billion constant LCU 534.42 billion constant LCU 235.14 billion constant LCU Nepal
2020s 374.30 billion constant LCU 674.95 billion constant LCU 300.66 billion constant LCU Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Congo or Nepal?
Nepal, at 725.01 billion constant LCU against 406.71 billion constant LCU in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Congo and Nepal?
318.30 billion constant LCU, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nepal?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Congo and Nepal rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Congo ranks 54th and Nepal ranks 51st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/congo-rep/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/congo-rep/nepal/">Congo vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.