Chile vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Chile
8.69 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Pakistan
9.70 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Chile rank
18th
Pakistan rank
17th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Chile
  • Pakistan
02.0T4.0T6.0T8.0T10.0T196019922025

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 9.70 trillion constant LCU against 8.69 trillion constant LCU in Chile, a difference of 1.01 trillion constant LCU.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 18th and Pakistan ranks 17th of 197 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 817.75 billion constant LCU 1.27 trillion constant LCU 456.81 billion constant LCU Pakistan
1970s 941.00 billion constant LCU 1.85 trillion constant LCU 911.53 billion constant LCU Pakistan
1980s 1.38 trillion constant LCU 2.61 trillion constant LCU 1.23 trillion constant LCU Pakistan
1990s 2.60 trillion constant LCU 3.99 trillion constant LCU 1.39 trillion constant LCU Pakistan
2000s 4.47 trillion constant LCU 5.61 trillion constant LCU 1.14 trillion constant LCU Pakistan
2010s 6.76 trillion constant LCU 7.15 trillion constant LCU 387.23 billion constant LCU Pakistan
2020s 7.72 trillion constant LCU 8.93 trillion constant LCU 1.21 trillion constant LCU Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Chile or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 9.70 trillion constant LCU against 8.69 trillion constant LCU in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Chile and Pakistan?
1.01 trillion constant LCU, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Pakistan?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Chile and Pakistan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Chile ranks 18th and Pakistan ranks 17th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/chile/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/chile/pakistan/">Chile vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.