Chile vs Japan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Chile
8.69 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Japan
5.90 trillion constant LCU
in 2024
Chile rank
18th
Japan rank
21st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Chile
  • Japan
02.0T4.0T6.0T8.0T10.0T196019922025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 8.69 trillion constant LCU against 5.90 trillion constant LCU in Japan, a difference of 2.79 trillion constant LCU.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.5 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Japan ahead.

Chile ranks 18th and Japan ranks 21st of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Japan Difference Ahead
1990s 2.86 trillion constant LCU 8.66 trillion constant LCU 5.80 trillion constant LCU Japan
2000s 4.47 trillion constant LCU 8.20 trillion constant LCU 3.73 trillion constant LCU Japan
2010s 6.76 trillion constant LCU 6.94 trillion constant LCU 178.45 billion constant LCU Japan
2020s 7.53 trillion constant LCU 5.86 trillion constant LCU 1.67 trillion constant LCU Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Chile or Japan?
Chile, at 8.69 trillion constant LCU against 5.90 trillion constant LCU in Japan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Chile and Japan?
2.79 trillion constant LCU, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Japan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Chile and Japan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Chile ranks 18th and Japan ranks 21st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Japan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/chile/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/chile/japan/">Chile vs Japan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.