Chad vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Chad
4.03 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Russian Federation
3.74 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Chad rank
26th
Russian Federation rank
28th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Chad
  • Russian Federation
01.0T2.0T3.0T4.0T199020072025

How they compare

Chad currently reports 4.03 trillion constant LCU against 3.74 trillion constant LCU in Russian Federation, a difference of 292.30 billion constant LCU.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Chad ranks 26th and Russian Federation ranks 28th of 197 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 1.82 trillion constant LCU 2.81 trillion constant LCU 983.11 billion constant LCU Russian Federation
2010s 2.69 trillion constant LCU 3.15 trillion constant LCU 457.68 billion constant LCU Russian Federation
2020s 3.59 trillion constant LCU 3.67 trillion constant LCU 74.56 billion constant LCU Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Chad or Russian Federation?
Chad, at 4.03 trillion constant LCU against 3.74 trillion constant LCU in Russian Federation as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Chad and Russian Federation?
292.30 billion constant LCU, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Russian Federation?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Chad and Russian Federation rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Chad ranks 26th and Russian Federation ranks 28th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/chad/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/chad/russian-federation/">Chad vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.