Cape Verde vs Ecuador: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Cape Verde
9.39 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Ecuador
10.24 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
118th
Ecuador rank
117th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Ecuador
2.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B12.5B196019922025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 10.24 billion constant LCU against 9.39 billion constant LCU in Cape Verde, a difference of 845.68 million constant LCU.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 118th and Ecuador ranks 117th of 197 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Ecuador Difference Ahead
1980s 2.03 billion constant LCU 2.00 billion constant LCU 32.99 million constant LCU Cape Verde
1990s 3.49 billion constant LCU 3.26 billion constant LCU 225.77 million constant LCU Cape Verde
2000s 6.89 billion constant LCU 4.65 billion constant LCU 2.23 billion constant LCU Cape Verde
2010s 9.97 billion constant LCU 7.12 billion constant LCU 2.85 billion constant LCU Cape Verde
2020s 9.32 billion constant LCU 9.27 billion constant LCU 46.22 million constant LCU Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Cape Verde or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 10.24 billion constant LCU against 9.39 billion constant LCU in Cape Verde as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Cape Verde and Ecuador?
845.68 million constant LCU, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Ecuador?
46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
How do Cape Verde and Ecuador rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Cape Verde ranks 118th and Ecuador ranks 117th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Ecuador: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/cabo-verde/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/cabo-verde/ecuador/">Cape Verde vs Ecuador: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.