Burkina Faso vs Kenya: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Burkina Faso
2.28 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Kenya
1.92 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
35th
Kenya rank
37th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Kenya
500.0B1.0T1.5T2.0T2.5T196419942025

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 2.28 trillion constant LCU against 1.92 trillion constant LCU in Kenya, a difference of 358.92 billion constant LCU.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 35th and Kenya ranks 37th of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Kenya in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Kenya Difference Ahead
1970s 414.88 billion constant LCU 484.86 billion constant LCU 69.98 billion constant LCU Kenya
1980s 505.54 billion constant LCU 702.71 billion constant LCU 197.17 billion constant LCU Kenya
1990s 800.08 billion constant LCU 865.33 billion constant LCU 65.25 billion constant LCU Kenya
2000s 1.14 trillion constant LCU 1.14 trillion constant LCU 4.52 billion constant LCU Burkina Faso
2010s 1.59 trillion constant LCU 1.46 trillion constant LCU 128.58 billion constant LCU Burkina Faso
2020s 1.91 trillion constant LCU 1.77 trillion constant LCU 132.00 billion constant LCU Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Burkina Faso or Kenya?
Burkina Faso, at 2.28 trillion constant LCU against 1.92 trillion constant LCU in Kenya as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Burkina Faso and Kenya?
358.92 billion constant LCU, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Kenya?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Kenya rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Burkina Faso ranks 35th and Kenya ranks 37th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Kenya: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/burkina-faso/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/burkina-faso/kenya/">Burkina Faso vs Kenya: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.