Botswana vs Eswatini: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Botswana
3.31 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Eswatini
3.83 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Botswana rank
132nd
Eswatini rank
130th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Botswana
  • Eswatini
1.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B196019922025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 3.83 billion constant LCU against 3.31 billion constant LCU in Botswana, a difference of 515.02 million constant LCU.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 132nd and Eswatini ranks 130th of 197 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 1.86 billion constant LCU 2.74 billion constant LCU 874.31 million constant LCU Eswatini
1980s 1.72 billion constant LCU 2.75 billion constant LCU 1.03 billion constant LCU Eswatini
1990s 2.34 billion constant LCU 2.97 billion constant LCU 630.39 million constant LCU Eswatini
2000s 2.41 billion constant LCU 3.63 billion constant LCU 1.22 billion constant LCU Eswatini
2010s 3.07 billion constant LCU 4.30 billion constant LCU 1.24 billion constant LCU Eswatini
2020s 3.23 billion constant LCU 4.07 billion constant LCU 834.92 million constant LCU Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Botswana or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 3.83 billion constant LCU against 3.31 billion constant LCU in Botswana as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Botswana and Eswatini?
515.02 million constant LCU, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Eswatini?
55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Eswatini rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Botswana ranks 132nd and Eswatini ranks 130th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Eswatini: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/botswana/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/botswana/eswatini/">Botswana vs Eswatini: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.