Belarus vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Belarus
16.23 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Netherlands
14.11 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Belarus rank
110th
Netherlands rank
112th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Belarus
  • Netherlands
05.0B10.0B15.0B196919972025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 16.23 billion constant LCU against 14.11 billion constant LCU in Netherlands, a difference of 2.12 billion constant LCU.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 110th and Netherlands ranks 112th of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Netherlands Difference Ahead
1990s 9.02 billion constant LCU 9.57 billion constant LCU 542.88 million constant LCU Netherlands
2000s 10.07 billion constant LCU 10.84 billion constant LCU 770.86 million constant LCU Netherlands
2010s 14.29 billion constant LCU 12.83 billion constant LCU 1.46 billion constant LCU Belarus
2020s 15.75 billion constant LCU 14.23 billion constant LCU 1.52 billion constant LCU Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Belarus or Netherlands?
Belarus, at 16.23 billion constant LCU against 14.11 billion constant LCU in Netherlands as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Belarus and Netherlands?
2.12 billion constant LCU, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Netherlands?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Netherlands rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Belarus ranks 110th and Netherlands ranks 112th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/belarus/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/belarus/netherlands/">Belarus vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.