Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Azerbaijan
2.20 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.00 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
139th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
141st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199220082025

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 2.20 billion constant LCU against 2.00 billion constant LCU in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 201.06 million constant LCU.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 139th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 141st of 197 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
2000s 1.09 billion constant LCU 1.82 billion constant LCU 737.70 million constant LCU Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1.57 billion constant LCU 1.94 billion constant LCU 367.55 million constant LCU Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 2.10 billion constant LCU 2.01 billion constant LCU 94.89 million constant LCU Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Azerbaijan or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Azerbaijan, at 2.20 billion constant LCU against 2.00 billion constant LCU in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
201.06 million constant LCU, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Azerbaijan ranks 139th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 141st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/azerbaijan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/azerbaijan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.