Armenia vs Kazakhstan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Armenia
771.88 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Kazakhstan
906.89 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Armenia rank
49th
Kazakhstan rank
46th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Armenia
  • Kazakhstan
400.0B600.0B800.0B1.0T199020072025

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 906.89 billion constant LCU against 771.88 billion constant LCU in Armenia, a difference of 135.00 billion constant LCU.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Armenia ranks 49th and Kazakhstan ranks 46th of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 362.99 billion constant LCU 513.00 billion constant LCU 150.01 billion constant LCU Kazakhstan
2000s 558.19 billion constant LCU 481.00 billion constant LCU 77.19 billion constant LCU Armenia
2010s 819.54 billion constant LCU 640.46 billion constant LCU 179.08 billion constant LCU Armenia
2020s 741.70 billion constant LCU 806.27 billion constant LCU 64.57 billion constant LCU Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Armenia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 906.89 billion constant LCU against 771.88 billion constant LCU in Armenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Armenia and Kazakhstan?
135.00 billion constant LCU, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kazakhstan?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Armenia and Kazakhstan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Armenia ranks 49th and Kazakhstan ranks 46th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Kazakhstan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/armenia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/armenia/kazakhstan/">Armenia vs Kazakhstan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.