Argentina vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Argentina
53.69 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Guatemala
54.57 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Argentina rank
85th
Guatemala rank
83rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Argentina
  • Guatemala
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B60.0B196019922025

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 54.57 billion constant LCU against 53.69 billion constant LCU in Argentina, a difference of 881.30 million constant LCU.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 85th and Guatemala ranks 83rd of 197 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 22.02 billion constant LCU 10.51 billion constant LCU 11.51 billion constant LCU Argentina
1970s 23.46 billion constant LCU 15.87 billion constant LCU 7.59 billion constant LCU Argentina
1980s 27.40 billion constant LCU 19.26 billion constant LCU 8.15 billion constant LCU Argentina
1990s 33.70 billion constant LCU 24.75 billion constant LCU 8.95 billion constant LCU Argentina
2000s 43.27 billion constant LCU 32.88 billion constant LCU 10.39 billion constant LCU Argentina
2010s 51.41 billion constant LCU 44.16 billion constant LCU 7.25 billion constant LCU Argentina
2020s 50.00 billion constant LCU 52.69 billion constant LCU 2.69 billion constant LCU Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Argentina or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 54.57 billion constant LCU against 53.69 billion constant LCU in Argentina as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Argentina and Guatemala?
881.30 million constant LCU, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Guatemala?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Argentina and Guatemala rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Argentina ranks 85th and Guatemala ranks 83rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/argentina/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/argentina/guatemala/">Argentina vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.