South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

South Sudan
0.138 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Zimbabwe
0.1563 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Sudan rank
117th
Zimbabwe rank
115th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • South Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.522.5196919972025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1563 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.138 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0183 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

South Sudan ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 197 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0966 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.5355 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.4389 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0983 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2572 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.1589 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.1563 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.138 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in South Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
0.0183 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
South Sudan ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/south-sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/south-sudan/zimbabwe/">South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,461 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.