Micronesia, Federated States of vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Micronesia, Federated States of
0.1284 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Norway
0.112 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
120th
Norway rank
122nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Micronesia, Federated States of
  • Norway
00.511.52197019972025

How they compare

Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 0.1284 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.112 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Norway, a difference of 0.0164 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Micronesia, Federated States of's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Norway ahead.

Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 120th and Norway ranks 122nd of 197 countries.

Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia, Federated States of Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2522 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2483 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0039 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Micronesia, Federated States of
2000s 0.227 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.156 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.071 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Micronesia, Federated States of
2010s 0.1858 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.1262 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0596 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Micronesia, Federated States of
2020s 0.1371 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.1217 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0154 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Micronesia, Federated States of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Micronesia, Federated States of or Norway?
Micronesia, Federated States of, at 0.1284 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.112 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Norway as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Micronesia, Federated States of and Norway?
0.0164 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Norway?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Norway rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 120th and Norway ranks 122nd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia, Federated States of vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/micronesia-fed-sts/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/micronesia-fed-sts/norway/">Micronesia, Federated States of vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,461 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.