Mauritania vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Mauritania
5.08 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Philippines
3.76 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Mauritania rank
58th
Philippines rank
61st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Mauritania
  • Philippines
050100150196019922025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 5.08 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 3.76 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Philippines, a difference of 1.32 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.3 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 58th and Philippines ranks 61st of 197 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 127.58 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 66.42 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 61.16 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1970s 46.27 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 45.94 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.3309 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1980s 24.97 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 21.11 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 3.85 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1990s 17.84 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 13.41 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 4.43 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2000s 12.16 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 11.58 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.5808 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2010s 6.31 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 5.72 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.5841 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2020s 5.46 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 4.26 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1.19 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Mauritania or Philippines?
Mauritania, at 5.08 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 3.76 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Philippines as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Mauritania and Philippines?
1.32 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Philippines?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Mauritania and Philippines rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Mauritania ranks 58th and Philippines ranks 61st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritania/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritania/philippines/">Mauritania vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,461 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.