Latvia vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Latvia
0.0206 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Panama
0.0232 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Latvia rank
156th
Panama rank
153rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Latvia
  • Panama
00.10.20.30.4197019972025

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.0232 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.0206 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0.0026 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 156th and Panama ranks 153rd of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 0.101 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.1022 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0011 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Panama
2000s 0.0584 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0865 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0282 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Panama
2010s 0.0353 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0303 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.005 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Latvia
2020s 0.027 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0259 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.001 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Latvia or Panama?
Panama, at 0.0232 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.0206 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Latvia and Panama?
0.0026 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Latvia ranks 156th and Panama ranks 153rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/latvia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/latvia/panama/">Latvia vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,461 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.