Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Botswana
0.1662 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0.1563 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Botswana rank
112th
Zimbabwe rank
115th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Botswana
  • Zimbabwe
05101520196019922025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.1662 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.1563 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0099 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 197 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 12.07 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 2.27 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 9.8 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Botswana
1970s 6.38 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1.38 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 5 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Botswana
1980s 1.22 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.7586 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.4651 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Botswana
1990s 0.5215 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.9679 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.4464 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2000s 0.2975 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1.03 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.7344 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0.2062 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2221 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.016 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0.1738 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.1758 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.002 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Botswana or Zimbabwe?
Botswana, at 0.1662 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.1563 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
0.0099 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
57 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Botswana ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/zimbabwe/">Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,461 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.