Barbados vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Barbados
0.0301 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0265 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Barbados rank
147th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
150th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.20.40.60.8197519992024

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0301 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.0265 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0036 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 147th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 150th of 197 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1980s 0.2333 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2206 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0127 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Barbados
1990s 0.134 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.302 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.168 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0731 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.1231 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0501 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0454 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0468 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0014 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0409 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0337 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0072 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Barbados or Trinidad and Tobago?
Barbados, at 0.0301 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.0265 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0036 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago?
41 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Barbados ranks 147th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 150th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/trinidad-and-tobago/">Barbados vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,461 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.