Moldova vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Moldova
695,876 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
639,276 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Moldova rank
70th
Uruguay rank
73rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Moldova
  • Uruguay
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k198320032023

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 695,876 constant LCU per square kilometre against 639,276 constant LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 56,600 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Moldova ahead.

Moldova ranks 70th and Uruguay ranks 73rd of 194 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 481,210 constant LCU per square kilometre 514,716 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,506 constant LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 499,560 constant LCU per square kilometre 540,240 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,680 constant LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 601,158 constant LCU per square kilometre 634,013 constant LCU per square kilometre 32,856 constant LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 610,582 constant LCU per square kilometre 625,317 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,736 constant LCU per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Moldova or Uruguay?
Moldova, at 695,876 constant LCU per square kilometre against 639,276 constant LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Moldova and Uruguay?
56,600 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Uruguay?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Moldova and Uruguay rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Moldova ranks 70th and Uruguay ranks 73rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Moldova vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/moldova/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/moldova/uruguay/">Moldova vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.