Mauritius vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Mauritius
8.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
4.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
40th
Nepal rank
43rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Nepal
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196519942023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 8.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 4.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 3.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.8 times Nepal's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 43rd of 194 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 4.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 4.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 4.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 5.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 6.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 7.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Mauritius or Nepal?
Mauritius, at 8.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 4.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Mauritius and Nepal?
3.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Nepal?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Nepal rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Mauritius ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 43rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/nepal/">Mauritius vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.