Malta vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Malta
78,438 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
72,924 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
126th
New Zealand rank
129th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Malta
  • New Zealand
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197720002023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 78,438 constant LCU per square kilometre against 72,924 constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 5,514 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 126th and New Zealand ranks 129th of 194 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 563,341 constant LCU per square kilometre 58,080 constant LCU per square kilometre 505,261 constant LCU per square kilometre Malta
2010s 449,037 constant LCU per square kilometre 65,272 constant LCU per square kilometre 383,765 constant LCU per square kilometre Malta
2020s 331,511 constant LCU per square kilometre 71,172 constant LCU per square kilometre 260,339 constant LCU per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Malta or New Zealand?
Malta, at 78,438 constant LCU per square kilometre against 72,924 constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Malta and New Zealand?
5,514 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Zealand?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Malta and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Malta ranks 126th and New Zealand ranks 129th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/malta/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/malta/new-zealand/">Malta vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.