Lithuania vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Lithuania
25,225 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
26,679 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
162nd
Panama rank
159th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Lithuania
  • Panama
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 26,679 constant LCU per square kilometre against 25,225 constant LCU per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 1,454 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 162nd and Panama ranks 159th of 194 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 21,856 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,095 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,762 constant LCU per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 19,978 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,200 constant LCU per square kilometre 777.82 constant LCU per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 23,136 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,315 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,821 constant LCU per square kilometre Lithuania
2020s 26,318 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,424 constant LCU per square kilometre 893.67 constant LCU per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Lithuania or Panama?
Panama, at 26,679 constant LCU per square kilometre against 25,225 constant LCU per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Lithuania and Panama?
1,454 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Panama?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Panama rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Lithuania ranks 162nd and Panama ranks 159th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/panama/">Lithuania vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.