Latvia vs Montenegro: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Latvia
15,994 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
15,388 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
171st
Montenegro rank
172nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Latvia
  • Montenegro
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199520092023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 15,994 constant LCU per square kilometre against 15,388 constant LCU per square kilometre in Montenegro, a difference of 606 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 171st and Montenegro ranks 172nd of 194 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 14,368 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,395 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,973 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 16,129 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,973 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,156 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 17,759 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,644 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,115 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Latvia or Montenegro?
Latvia, at 15,994 constant LCU per square kilometre against 15,388 constant LCU per square kilometre in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Latvia and Montenegro?
606 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Montenegro rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Latvia ranks 171st and Montenegro ranks 172nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Montenegro: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/montenegro/">Latvia vs Montenegro: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.