Latvia vs Liberia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Latvia
15,994 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia
14,992 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
171st
Liberia rank
173rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Latvia
  • Liberia
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199520092023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 15,994 constant LCU per square kilometre against 14,992 constant LCU per square kilometre in Liberia, a difference of 1,002 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 171st and Liberia ranks 173rd of 194 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Liberia Difference Ahead
2000s 13,318 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,935 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,383 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 16,129 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,200 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,929 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 17,759 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,311 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,448 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Latvia or Liberia?
Latvia, at 15,994 constant LCU per square kilometre against 14,992 constant LCU per square kilometre in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Latvia and Liberia?
1,002 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Liberia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Liberia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Latvia ranks 171st and Liberia ranks 173rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Liberia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/liberia/">Latvia vs Liberia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.