Kiribati vs Romania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Kiribati
104,291 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
111,160 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
120th
Romania rank
118th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Kiribati
  • Romania
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k197920012023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 111,160 constant LCU per square kilometre against 104,291 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 6,869 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.

Kiribati ranks 120th and Romania ranks 118th of 194 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 78,077 constant LCU per square kilometre 109,374 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,297 constant LCU per square kilometre Romania
2000s 68,002 constant LCU per square kilometre 102,297 constant LCU per square kilometre 34,295 constant LCU per square kilometre Romania
2010s 84,794 constant LCU per square kilometre 100,508 constant LCU per square kilometre 15,715 constant LCU per square kilometre Romania
2020s 103,764 constant LCU per square kilometre 108,636 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,872 constant LCU per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Kiribati or Romania?
Romania, at 111,160 constant LCU per square kilometre against 104,291 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Kiribati and Romania?
6,869 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Romania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Romania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Kiribati ranks 120th and Romania ranks 118th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Romania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/romania/">Kiribati vs Romania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.