Jordan vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Jordan
22,242 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
22,128 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
164th
East Timor rank
165th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Jordan
  • East Timor
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197619992023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 22,242 constant LCU per square kilometre against 22,128 constant LCU per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 114 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Timor ahead.

Jordan ranks 164th and East Timor ranks 165th of 194 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 9,223 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,933 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,709 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 17,264 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,493 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,229 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 20,539 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,850 constant LCU per square kilometre 311.28 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Jordan or East Timor?
Jordan, at 22,242 constant LCU per square kilometre against 22,128 constant LCU per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Jordan and East Timor?
114 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and East Timor?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Jordan and East Timor rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Jordan ranks 164th and East Timor ranks 165th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jordan/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jordan/timor-leste/">Jordan vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.