Grenada vs Honduras: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Grenada
264,794 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras
265,970 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada rank
96th
Honduras rank
94th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Grenada
  • Honduras
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 265,970 constant LCU per square kilometre against 264,794 constant LCU per square kilometre in Grenada, a difference of 1,176 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 96th and Honduras ranks 94th of 194 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Honduras Difference Ahead
1970s 335,480 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,790 constant LCU per square kilometre 317,689 constant LCU per square kilometre Grenada
1980s 338,555 constant LCU per square kilometre 22,717 constant LCU per square kilometre 315,838 constant LCU per square kilometre Grenada
1990s 307,022 constant LCU per square kilometre 82,487 constant LCU per square kilometre 224,535 constant LCU per square kilometre Grenada
2000s 262,255 constant LCU per square kilometre 159,590 constant LCU per square kilometre 102,664 constant LCU per square kilometre Grenada
2010s 360,644 constant LCU per square kilometre 233,111 constant LCU per square kilometre 127,533 constant LCU per square kilometre Grenada
2020s 330,140 constant LCU per square kilometre 258,986 constant LCU per square kilometre 71,154 constant LCU per square kilometre Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Grenada or Honduras?
Honduras, at 265,970 constant LCU per square kilometre against 264,794 constant LCU per square kilometre in Grenada as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Grenada and Honduras?
1,176 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Honduras?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Honduras rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Grenada ranks 96th and Honduras ranks 94th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Honduras: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/grenada/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/grenada/honduras/">Grenada vs Honduras: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.