France vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

France
64,809 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
72,924 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
France rank
132nd
New Zealand rank
129th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • France
  • New Zealand
30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k70.0k196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 72,924 constant LCU per square kilometre against 64,809 constant LCU per square kilometre in France, a difference of 8,115 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times France's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was France ahead.

France ranks 132nd and New Zealand ranks 129th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, France averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade France New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 35,348 constant LCU per square kilometre 26,639 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,709 constant LCU per square kilometre France
1980s 44,069 constant LCU per square kilometre 35,513 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,556 constant LCU per square kilometre France
1990s 54,517 constant LCU per square kilometre 48,419 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,098 constant LCU per square kilometre France
2000s 62,153 constant LCU per square kilometre 58,080 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,073 constant LCU per square kilometre France
2010s 66,671 constant LCU per square kilometre 65,272 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,399 constant LCU per square kilometre France
2020s 62,836 constant LCU per square kilometre 71,172 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,335 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, France or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 72,924 constant LCU per square kilometre against 64,809 constant LCU per square kilometre in France as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between France and New Zealand?
8,115 constant LCU per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and New Zealand?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do France and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
France ranks 132nd and New Zealand ranks 129th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/france/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/france/new-zealand/">France vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.