Eswatini vs Nicaragua: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Eswatini
224,342 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
239,191 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
101st
Nicaragua rank
99th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Nicaragua
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 239,191 constant LCU per square kilometre against 224,342 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 14,849 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 101st and Nicaragua ranks 99th of 194 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 159,147 constant LCU per square kilometre 112,446 constant LCU per square kilometre 46,701 constant LCU per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 159,855 constant LCU per square kilometre 93,969 constant LCU per square kilometre 65,886 constant LCU per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 172,502 constant LCU per square kilometre 98,858 constant LCU per square kilometre 73,643 constant LCU per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 211,068 constant LCU per square kilometre 153,257 constant LCU per square kilometre 57,811 constant LCU per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 250,275 constant LCU per square kilometre 202,228 constant LCU per square kilometre 48,047 constant LCU per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 243,741 constant LCU per square kilometre 240,546 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,195 constant LCU per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Eswatini or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 239,191 constant LCU per square kilometre against 224,342 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Eswatini and Nicaragua?
14,849 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nicaragua?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Nicaragua rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Eswatini ranks 101st and Nicaragua ranks 99th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Nicaragua: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nicaragua/">Eswatini vs Nicaragua: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.