Eritrea vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Eritrea
7,891 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2009
Zambia
10,603 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea rank
182nd
Zambia rank
179th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Eritrea
  • Zambia
05.0k10.0k15.0k196519942023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 10,603 constant LCU per square kilometre against 7,891 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 2,712 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zambia ahead.

Eritrea ranks 182nd and Zambia ranks 179th of 194 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 12,015 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,975 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,959 constant LCU per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 10,021 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,023 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,002 constant LCU per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Eritrea or Zambia?
Zambia, at 10,603 constant LCU per square kilometre against 7,891 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Eritrea and Zambia?
2,712 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Zambia?
17 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2009.
How do Eritrea and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Eritrea ranks 182nd and Zambia ranks 179th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/zambia/">Eritrea vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.