Ecuador vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Ecuador
37,888 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia
39,126 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
150th
Slovenia rank
147th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Slovenia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 39,126 constant LCU per square kilometre against 37,888 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 1,238 constant LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 150th and Slovenia ranks 147th of 194 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 13,475 constant LCU per square kilometre 37,933 constant LCU per square kilometre 24,457 constant LCU per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 18,736 constant LCU per square kilometre 38,575 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,839 constant LCU per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 28,654 constant LCU per square kilometre 37,821 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,167 constant LCU per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 36,237 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,016 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,779 constant LCU per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Ecuador or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 39,126 constant LCU per square kilometre against 37,888 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Ecuador and Slovenia?
1,238 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Slovenia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Slovenia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Ecuador ranks 150th and Slovenia ranks 147th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/slovenia/">Ecuador vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.