Cuba vs Estonia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Cuba
10,183 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia
8,094 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
180th
Estonia rank
181st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Cuba
  • Estonia
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 10,183 constant LCU per square kilometre against 8,094 constant LCU per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 2,089 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.3 times Estonia's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 180th and Estonia ranks 181st of 194 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 15,706 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,124 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,583 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 17,377 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,448 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,930 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 19,108 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,879 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,230 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 12,305 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,441 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,864 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Cuba or Estonia?
Cuba, at 10,183 constant LCU per square kilometre against 8,094 constant LCU per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Cuba and Estonia?
2,089 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Estonia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Estonia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Cuba ranks 180th and Estonia ranks 181st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Estonia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/estonia/">Cuba vs Estonia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.