Cuba vs Eritrea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Cuba
10,183 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea
7,891 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2009
Cuba rank
180th
Eritrea rank
182nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Cuba
  • Eritrea
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 10,183 constant LCU per square kilometre against 7,891 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 2,292 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.3 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 180th and Eritrea ranks 182nd of 194 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 15,194 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,015 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,179 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 17,377 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,021 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,356 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Cuba or Eritrea?
Cuba, at 10,183 constant LCU per square kilometre against 7,891 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Cuba and Eritrea?
2,292 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eritrea?
17 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2009.
How do Cuba and Eritrea rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Cuba ranks 180th and Eritrea ranks 182nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Eritrea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/eritrea/">Cuba vs Eritrea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.