Costa Rica vs Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Costa Rica
37.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
38.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
17th
Tanzania rank
16th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Tanzania
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 38.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 37.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 17th and Tanzania ranks 16th of 194 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 21.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 28.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre 18.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 35.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre 28.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 37.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre 36.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre 711,850 constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Costa Rica or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 38.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 37.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Costa Rica and Tanzania?
1.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Tanzania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Costa Rica ranks 17th and Tanzania ranks 16th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/tanzania/">Costa Rica vs Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.