China vs Congo: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per
China
964,940 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
66th
Congo rank
63rd
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time
- China
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 964,940 constant LCU per square kilometre in China, a difference of 137,240 constant LCU per square kilometre.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times China's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
China ranks 66th and Congo ranks 63rd of 194 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 102,080 constant LCU per square kilometre | 230,900 constant LCU per square kilometre | 128,821 constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 1970s | 139,402 constant LCU per square kilometre | 302,366 constant LCU per square kilometre | 162,964 constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 1980s | 205,729 constant LCU per square kilometre | 420,772 constant LCU per square kilometre | 215,042 constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 1990s | 321,837 constant LCU per square kilometre | 462,349 constant LCU per square kilometre | 140,512 constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2000s | 459,838 constant LCU per square kilometre | 590,455 constant LCU per square kilometre | 130,617 constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2010s | 690,552 constant LCU per square kilometre | 876,355 constant LCU per square kilometre | 185,803 constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2020s | 903,353 constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 155,844 constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, China or Congo?
- Congo, at 1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 964,940 constant LCU per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between China and Congo?
- 137,240 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Congo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do China and Congo rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
- China ranks 66th and Congo ranks 63rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.