Central African Republic vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Central African Republic
407,854 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Netherlands
422,875 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
84th
Netherlands rank
83rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Netherlands
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196919962023

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 422,875 constant LCU per square kilometre against 407,854 constant LCU per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 15,021 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 84th and Netherlands ranks 83rd of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 540,934 constant LCU per square kilometre 354,560 constant LCU per square kilometre 186,374 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 363,005 constant LCU per square kilometre 380,835 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,830 constant LCU per square kilometre Netherlands
2020s 359,476 constant LCU per square kilometre 426,051 constant LCU per square kilometre 66,575 constant LCU per square kilometre Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Central African Republic or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 422,875 constant LCU per square kilometre against 407,854 constant LCU per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Central African Republic and Netherlands?
15,021 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Netherlands?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Netherlands rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Central African Republic ranks 84th and Netherlands ranks 83rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/netherlands/">Central African Republic vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.