Central African Republic vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Central African Republic
407,854 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
359,778 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
84th
Mozambique rank
86th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Mozambique
0200.0k400.0k600.0k198420032023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 407,854 constant LCU per square kilometre against 359,778 constant LCU per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 48,076 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 84th and Mozambique ranks 86th of 194 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 540,934 constant LCU per square kilometre 221,384 constant LCU per square kilometre 319,550 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 363,005 constant LCU per square kilometre 267,182 constant LCU per square kilometre 95,823 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 359,476 constant LCU per square kilometre 338,016 constant LCU per square kilometre 21,460 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Central African Republic or Mozambique?
Central African Republic, at 407,854 constant LCU per square kilometre against 359,778 constant LCU per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Central African Republic and Mozambique?
48,076 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mozambique?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Mozambique rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Central African Republic ranks 84th and Mozambique ranks 86th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mozambique/">Central African Republic vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.