Canada vs Greenland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Canada
4,753 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
5,423 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
189th
Greenland rank
188th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Canada
  • Greenland
02.0k4.0k6.0k199720102023

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 5,423 constant LCU per square kilometre against 4,753 constant LCU per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 670 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Greenland's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Greenland ahead.

Canada ranks 189th and Greenland ranks 188th of 194 countries.

Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Greenland Difference Ahead
2000s 3,578 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,328 constant LCU per square kilometre 749.8 constant LCU per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 4,105 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,547 constant LCU per square kilometre 441.47 constant LCU per square kilometre Greenland
2020s 4,548 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,199 constant LCU per square kilometre 650.63 constant LCU per square kilometre Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Canada or Greenland?
Greenland, at 5,423 constant LCU per square kilometre against 4,753 constant LCU per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Canada and Greenland?
670 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Greenland?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Canada and Greenland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Canada ranks 189th and Greenland ranks 188th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Greenland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/greenland/">Canada vs Greenland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.